加里森敢死队

中国首部城镇房屋安全保险工作指南在渝发布,中国首部城镇房屋安全保险工作指南在渝发布_我的网站

一 |     NEW DELHI -- India’s top court on Tuesday refused to legalize same-sex marriages, passing the responsibility back to Parliament in a ruling that disappointed campaigners for LGBTQ+ rights in the world's most populous country. Chief Justice DY Chandrachud also urged the government to uphold the rights of the queer community and end discrimination against them. Earlier this year, the five-judge bench heard 21 petitions that sought to legalize same-sex marriage. Chandrachud said there were degrees of agreement and disagreement among the justices “on how far we have to go” on same-sex marriages, but a majority of the judges agreed that the court cannot grant LGBTQ+ people the right to marry as that is a legislative function. “This court can’t make law. It can only interpret it and give effect to it,” the chief justice said, reiterating that it was up to Parliament to decide whether it could expand marriage laws to include queer unions.One of the petitioners, Mario da Penha, said it was “a day to be disappointed but not to lose hope.”“There's been tremendous work that has gone into these petitions, and many hopes and dreams of the queer community attached to them - to lead lives that most other Indians take for granted. The fact that the dream could not come to fruition today is a disappointment for all of us,” he said.He added that it was not yet clear if the court had set a mandate or timeline for Parliament to act. “Without that mandate, there is no pressure on Parliament to enact any legislation.”“There are queer couples today that are already families and in relationships, and are pillars of society. That they are not afforded the dignity and rights that they are due is deeply disappointing,” said Karuna Nundy, one of the lawyers representing the petitioners. Legal rights for LGBTQ+ people in India have been expanding over the past decade, mostly as a result of the Supreme Court’s intervention. In 2018, the top court struck down a colonial-era law that had made gay sex punishable by up to 10 years in prison and expanded constitutional rights for the gay community. The decision was seen as a historic victory for LGBTQ rights, with one judge saying it would “pave the way for a better future."Despite this progress, Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government resisted the legal recognition of same-sex marriage and rejected several petitions in favor. During the hearings, the government argued that a marriage is only between a biological male and a biological woman, adding that same-sex marriages went against religious values and that the petitions reflected only “urban elitist views”. Religious groups too had opposed same-sex unions, saying they went against Indian culture.Adish Aggarwala, the president of the Supreme Court bar association, said the court had done the right thing by recognizing that this was a job for Parliament, an argument the government also made during the hearings. Lawyers for the petitioners argued that marriage is between two people, not just a man and woman. They said concepts of marriage have gradually changed with time and laws should acknowledge that. By not recognizing such unions, the government was depriving same-sex couples of their right to equality enshrined in the constitution and rights enjoyed by married heterosexual couples, from adoption and medical insurance to pensions and inheritance, they argued. “This court needs to push society to acknowledge same-sex marriage,” one of the lawyers said.Petitioners were hopeful that the Supreme Court could challenge the government’s position.But even as some of the justices urged that the state must make sure queer couples don't face harassment or discrimination in accessing basic needs, like opening a joint bank account, they stopped short of granting legal recognition to same-sex unions. Instead, the court accepted the government's offer to set up a special panel that will explore granting social and legal benefits to same-sex couples. Homosexuality has long carried a stigma in India’s traditional society, even though there has been a shift in attitudes toward same-sex couples in recent years. India now has openly gay celebrities and some high-profile Bollywood films have dealt with gay issues. According to a Pew survey, acceptance of homosexuality in India increased by 22 percentage points to 37% between 2013 and 2019.But same-sex couples often face harassment in many Indian communities, whether Hindu, Muslim or Christian.India is estimated to have at least 2.5 million LGBTQ+ people, according to government figures from 2012. However, gay rights activists and global estimates believe they number at least 10% of the population, or more than 135 million.In May, Taiwan became the first jurisdiction in Asia to recognize same-sex marriages. In July, Nepal's Supreme Court issued an interim order enabling the registration of same-sex marriages for the first time. It is still not clear when the court would make its final decision on the case.。    　　中新社重庆8月21日电 (张旭)重庆市住房和城乡建设委员会21日发布消息称，该委日前正式印发《重庆市城镇房屋安全保险工作指南(试行)》(下称指南)。这是中国首部专门针对城镇房屋安全保险的综合性工作指南。　　针对不同类型房屋和风险场景，指南推出了房屋主体类、围护及设施设备类、公共安全责任类、施工类保险产品，基本实现城镇房屋安全风险全覆盖。　　在理赔环节，指南明确了全流程规范：知悉事故后24小时内报案(不可抗力除外)，保险机构24小时内赶赴现场查勘，同步开展应急施救、损失核定。

二 | 5000元人民币及以下小额财产损失启用线上快赔通道，对于已明确属于保险责任的事故，被保险人线上完整提交资料、完成信息核验后，赔款24小时内到账。2025年2月8日，航拍重庆中心城区住宅楼群。(无人机照片) 中新社记者 何蓬磊 摄　　值得关注的是先行赔付制度：出现人员伤亡、房屋倒塌危及公共安全等紧急情形时，保险机构应先行支付不低于预估赔偿金额50%的资金，用于应急救援、受灾居民临时安置和紧急排险。　　指南的一大亮点是强化保险机构的“风险减量服务”功能。保险机构须按实际收取保费的20%左右专项用于房屋安全风险防范、事故预防相关工作。该项工作实行单独立项、单独核算。　　重庆市住房和城乡建设委员会表示，重庆城镇化正从快速增长期转向稳定发展期，城镇房屋“老龄化”问题日益凸显。指南将为房屋安全构建起“事前预防、事中管控、事后赔付”的全链条风险防控体系。

Current article:http://59z8kf1.yaoyaotoutuanmieshaideizun.buzz/list_y706jo/i6ky1.html

Published on:05:22:07